Maersk Line
32 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Bremen 1
09.11.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Hamburg 2
18.08.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Hamburg 3
19.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Filling employment. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Hamburg 4
15.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Hamburg 5
28.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 6
28.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 7
26.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 8
27.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 9
18.05.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 10
18.05.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 11
03.02.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Hamburg 12
26.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 13
15.08.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Hamburg 14
31.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Interesting tasks. Below-average salary. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Hamburg 15
15.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 16
19.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 17
02.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 18
13.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 19
13.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 20
09.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 21
01.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Hamburg 22
26.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 23
26.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Germany 24
10.06.2022
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 25
22.12.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
29.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 27
21.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 28
21.10.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 29
19.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 30
23.02.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 31
06.02.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
London 32
01.04.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
